I want to see it again and I want to get lost in its wonderland. It has also been some time since I last casually viewed the classic animated version, and I still recall it with vivid and joyful thoughts. But, it’s been quite a while since my last viewing of the movie, and I don’t really feel compelled to watch it again anytime soon it was good, but nothing really got me really going from the movie. The story was gritty and realistic, which melded well with wonderland’s fantastical nature. It’s tied and comes down to this final point: which one left a greater lasting impression? Tim Burton’s remake was enjoyable to watch, and had memorable characters. Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter couldn’t have been a better choice and definitely gives the remake a point. Anne Hathaway, Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter are all wonderful actors and definitely memorable. Burton did a great job with casting in his version of the film. No one really stood out aside from the Cheshire Cat and the Queen of Hearts.
They were fitting for there characters, but that’s about it. Not much can really be said for the animated movies cast of voice actors. Hands down this point goes to the classic, for it’s memorable nature and originality. I still sing “Have a very Merry un-Birthday” to myself when I think of the movie.
#Alice in wonderland cartoon online movie
The animated movie had memorable songs and scores that were as whimsical as the movie itself. Nothing was really memorable, and some of the songs verged on the line of sounding like stock music. Yet, nothing really pops out to me when I think of the music of the movie, aside from the song the group 3Oh3 made for the movie. The remake had an astounding score that complemented the scenes it played for, and was overall top of the line. Burton gets props for his stylistic visuals, but the point has to go to the animated classic. The animated version just pulls off the whimsical nature of the story better than the remake, with its bright, colorful characters that only hand drawn animation can get across. “Alice in Wonderland” is just as its title says: a girl named Alice gets lost in a wonderland. However, I would have to say that the animated version just beats it out. The movie is great to look at, and that can’t be denied. It’s dark, fantastical and yet realistic in a gritty sense. The remake has the style Burton has made his career off of. And while the animated film is superior in following the book, the point has to go to the remake for its own twist. It is much easier to follow the plot of the remake because the film takes its time to explain what is going on, dissimilar to Carroll’s original story. Burton takes a much more serious and dark approach to the story, as with most of his movies. The classic animated version tends to stay closer to the “Alice in Wonderland” story, while Tim Burton’s version melds the story with aspects of “Through the Looking Glass.” In the animated version, everything was so confusing and not much semblance of a proper plot could be made, much like the original story. Both are masterpieces in filmmaking, and both are loved by many.īoth movies are based off of Lewis Carroll classic story about a little girl named Alice, falling into a rabbit’s hole and landing into a world of whimsy and oddities. In this, the inaugural article, I will be comparing Disney’s classic animated masterpiece, “Alice in Wonderland,” and the 2010 Tim Burton live-action remake/reimagining. But there is the occasional remake that is good enough to even best the original. A lot of times remakes are seen as nothing more than a failed attempt to make money off of an already love and established franchise. It’s hard to go to the movies this day and age, and actually see a movie that isn’t a remake.
0 kommentar(er)
